Which pair of names is given as an author associated with the idea that colonists were under Parliament's authority and economic protests would harm the colonies?

• A. Samuel Seabury / Daniel Leonard
• B. Jonathan Mayhew
• C. James Otis
• D. Luther Martin

Answer: (A)

This question hinges on the Loyalist position during the debate over imperial authority. Samuel Seabury, a Connecticut clergyman, together with Daniel Leonard, a Massachusetts pamphleteer, represented writers who argued that Parliament had legitimate authority over the colonies and that resistance through economic protests—such as nonimportation or boycotts—would actually harm the colonies by cutting off trade and economic stability. They urged loyalty to the Crown and preferred petitioning and lawful channels to address grievances, rather than challenging Parliament’s sovereignty or pursuing independence.

In contrast, figures like Jonathan Mayhew and James Otis are remembered for emphasizing colonial rights and resisting Parliament’s authority, while Luther Martin aligned with Patriot movements advocating independence. Their writings and actions focus on challenging imperial authority rather than upholding it, which is why the Seabury–Leonard pairing best fits the described idea.