What is John Rawls's theory of justice as fairness and its two principles?

Study for the PS4700 American Political Thought Test. Enhance your knowledge with multiple-choice questions, hints, and explanations. Get ready for your exam with ease!

Multiple Choice

What is John Rawls's theory of justice as fairness and its two principles?

Explanation:
Rawls’s idea of justice as fairness rests on guaranteeing fundamental freedoms for everyone and organizing social arrangements so that any inequalities help those who are worst off, while still ensuring fair opportunity for all. The first rule is that each person should have equal basic liberties that are compatible with the liberties of others. Think of rights like freedom of thought, conscience, and political participation—these are essential, and everyone gets them in equal measure. The second rule governs economic and social arrangements. Inequality is allowed only if it makes the least advantaged better off and if offices and positions are open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity. In other words, you can have wealth differences, but they must benefit the least advantaged and be accessible to everyone who is capable and motivated to compete for them. So the best description is the one that names equal basic liberties and the idea that inequalities should be arranged to help the least advantaged, with opportunities open to all. The other options describe doctrines that Rawls rejects—unrestricted free markets with minimal government, or attempts at absolute equality or atheism—neither of which match justice as fairness.

Rawls’s idea of justice as fairness rests on guaranteeing fundamental freedoms for everyone and organizing social arrangements so that any inequalities help those who are worst off, while still ensuring fair opportunity for all.

The first rule is that each person should have equal basic liberties that are compatible with the liberties of others. Think of rights like freedom of thought, conscience, and political participation—these are essential, and everyone gets them in equal measure.

The second rule governs economic and social arrangements. Inequality is allowed only if it makes the least advantaged better off and if offices and positions are open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity. In other words, you can have wealth differences, but they must benefit the least advantaged and be accessible to everyone who is capable and motivated to compete for them.

So the best description is the one that names equal basic liberties and the idea that inequalities should be arranged to help the least advantaged, with opportunities open to all. The other options describe doctrines that Rawls rejects—unrestricted free markets with minimal government, or attempts at absolute equality or atheism—neither of which match justice as fairness.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy